Mitigation evaluations in Georgia courtrooms provide judges with a fuller understanding of a defendant’s background during sentencing. Conducted by forensic psychologists, these assessments examine mental health, trauma, and social history to contextualize criminal behavior. While they don’t challenge guilt, they can shape more individualized sentencing decisions and raise key questions about fairness and justice.

A clear, practice-focused overview of the difference between competency to stand trial and the insanity defense in Georgia criminal law. The post explains how CST addresses a defendant’s present ability to participate in court proceedings, while insanity focuses on mental state at the time of the offense. It also outlines key Georgia statutes, case law, and the essential role of forensic psychologists in these evaluations.

Michigan’s Ruling That Redefines Youth & Justice In April 2025, the Michigan Supreme Court made a groundbreaking decision. The court held that mandatory life-without-parole sentences for 19- and 20-year-olds convicted of murder violate the state constitution. The justices concluded that imposing such punishment without considering an offender’s youth and capacity for change is “grossly disproportionate.” This ruling is significant. The court relied on scientific evidence sh

“Psychosis” is a term often heard but widely misunderstood, frequently associated with inaccurate and harmful stereotypes. To cut through the confusion, we’ve distilled the core insights of clinical and forensic psychologist Dr. Douglas E. Lewis, Jr., from his interview with Harsh Patel titled “Mental Health Support in Jail: Competency Restoration Explained.” This blog provides a clear, simple explanation of what psychosis is, what its symptoms are, and addresses one of the